Contention and prevention are today’s topic on the table of roundness (which is actually square). More specifically PM Jae Gills has called us all to the polls (no, not a gentlemen’s club) to vote for her, ideally and not the real life Lord Voldemort that is Tony Abbot. What I meant to say was we are having a regional electorate to fairly decide this country’s leader per K. Rudd’s impromptu dismissal. I thought it be a good idea to try and level the playing field a bit by dousing some of the cons that might influencing your voting. No pros because I don’t believe in them, unless it’s prose or baseball legend Pete Rose.
So word on the street (and possibly in the national news) is that PM Julian Gillard is an athiest. What this means is that has no holistic or religious views, which includes an absence of belief in God. I think the united Christian community of Australia’s reaction could be summed up by this:
“Yes they’re eating her. BECAUSE SHE’S A DAMN HEATHEN!!!”
I kid, I kid. But there’s a few points I’d like to throw out into the abyss of human negligence without ranting too much. First of all there’s a line (I’ll give you a hint* it’s invisible) between an individuals religious beliefs and their occupations, unless you work for the vatican or are devout to a church. Julian Gillard’s j-o-b is to be the Prime Minister; to ensure the best outcome for Australia’s well-being. This is what we should care about, what she is, not the “who”. I have no intentions of dating Ms. Gillard anytime soon, so I don’t feel that I need-to-know/care about the PM on an intimate level. As she stated in an ABC interview, “I am what I am and people will judge that.”
Do not misunderstand me, I am fairly religious and yeah I believe in God. But case in point I believe that we were made to be at least intelligent in our understanding of a situation. And clearly she’s aware of the fallacy of human ignorance.
Gillard stated in a recent interview that she does not enforce her atheism: ”I’m, of course, a great respecter of religious beliefs but they’re not my beliefs.”
Seriously there is nothing wrong with that. Why don’t we just focus on the ranga styles which clearly deserves more attention.
Anti-Tony Abbot campaigns have already begun circulating on the ole’ tube (not YouTube). Wait yes YouTube…
I don’t care who you are, that’s fucking incredible. I wouldn’t discredit the fact that Tony “the Tongue” could win with a sweet trick like that up his sleeve. Awesome comment left by 2010TheSpade that was too good to not mention: “He dreaming of the devouring of Gillard at the next election.”
Grammatical issues aside the question now is do we regard Abbot’s rumored use of ginger floss as a) a con or b) a pro? This young hopeful thinks he knows the secret:
Now I will formally apologise for his partial ignorance (and pigmentation disorder). I’m sorry kid, what you claim has never been scientifically or statistically proven and therefore holds no validity. Not even your beloved hero can save you!
The aftermath of this incident left the mast and rigging fairly smashed up but thankfully no one was hurt. Now as awesome as this is, I would like to emplore that we can no longer afford to oversight what has occurred here. I knew, and certainly the Japanese did, that it was only going to be a matter of time before the deep dark blue part of the marble rebelled against us, and how prophetic is it that it starts with our distant, physically superior cousin.